There is nothing on the record in that report, or in the committee reports from the UN, that show they consulted with anyone outside of those who are opposed to MAID MI-SUMC. They didn't talk to any experts or people with lived experience who were not opposed. They had a private briefing session with organizations that only brought the anti-track 2 perspective.
I think it's hard to base profound decisions like what you're facing on a report that is based on very one-sided submissions. It would be better to consider the research that is objective and based on looking at both sides of the issue.