What have I been doing? I think my position over the last eight or nine years working in addictions has changed. It's evolved. I am still a supporter of MAID, and I do it regularly.
The premise here that we have to look at is about what's incurable. What are we basing that on? What is the standard definition we have for “treatment resistance”, which is often used—treatment-resistant to what? Treatments have been offered. Is that enough? Were they culturally specific? Were they trauma-informed? You have individuals who have all these issues, and they're not going to engage....
Dr. Neufeld, a couple of days ago, talked about the therapeutic alliance. Just because something is offered.... If there's no connection, where is the person in their trajectory? Are they pre-contemplative or contemplative? Do they believe in it? All those factors are known. Research shows whether a treatment would work or not. Are we accounting for all that?
When we look at any treatment, to be treatment-resistant.... We talk about a biopsychosocial treatment for all psychiatric issues. Yes, we give biological medications, but are people actually following them? Are they compliant and adhering to them? For psychological therapy, do people have funding to get that therapy? Do they actually access it? If they're single parents, do they have the money for it and do they have the time for it?
The final part is social. That's usually a little footnote. If you look at most of the psychiatric assessments—it's not because they're faulty; everybody is intentional—you see that those are out of the grasp of the psychiatrist or the treating physician. In many of those cases are the fundamental routes for many of these ailments. We're saying they're incurable, but we haven't given equal time, effort and resources to the biopsychosocial side, so how can we say they're incurable?