I'm not a clinician, in any sense. I would defer to the clinicians who spoke here, both those who are for it and those who are against it.
There's no consensus on it. If there's no consensus.... I'm not sure what percentage would be acceptable. Maybe 80% think it isn't irremediable. Is it 40%? What's the acceptable number of people who might be euthanized but who could have had a better life? For me, it's zero. Unless there's 100% agreement on this, we are running the risk of euthanizing people who could have led a good life. That's not a risk I would take, personally, because I know the damage it does to families and how everyone has to go through this.
I'm not debating the credibility of the clinicians, but the fact that they are so divided should give this committee pause, so that it says, “What are we talking about? There's no consensus here, so how can we push forward or expand a law on something nobody can agree on?” It's not like—