I have two unrelated questions. I'm just going to ask them so we can respect the time, and you can judge your responses accordingly.
It's interesting to hear you say today that this is the military phase and that we should be playing a major role in the region until it has been further stabilized. We heard from some NGOs who raised concerns about the blurring of roles that they claim arises when our soldiers provide humanitarian relief.
On one hand, we're told that the soldiers must win the hearts and minds of the Afghan citizens, yet the NGOs say that this is dangerous for the NGOs. In your opinion, should soldiers be providing humanitarian efforts while they're there on a peacekeeping mission?
On a completely different question, the role of Pakistan has been raised. You mentioned that stability in Afghanistan would provide economic benefit through trade and commerce. Would you explain any advantages that Pakistan would have from the extended instability of Afghanistan?