It seems quite apparent that these kinds of motions are simply playing political games and distracting us from our primary objectives. If it's truly the case that she was really concerned about these presentations, then perhaps she could have worked with her opposition colleagues to ensure that there was the support needed to make sure the presentations could continue. But this was not in fact the case. Perhaps she's looking in the wrong direction and she should be looking to her side of these tables.
Finally, Mr. Chair, if you consulted the rules that govern committees, you would find that according to Marleau and Montpetit this motion is out of order, as there is, and I quote from Marleau and Montpetit, “the well-established rule which holds that a question”-- and I'm referring to the question in terms of the one to end a committee session last Thursday--“once put and carried in the affirmative or negative, cannot be questioned again.”
I think the motion is out of order.