Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Through you, I would like to congratulate the witnesses. In my past life I was a health care provider as well, and I can tell you, it's not such a bad thing to be accused of being an advocate for your patient.
I can also tell you, and perhaps my colleagues, about my experience with the insurance industry. I worked for them and would give them opinions. If they liked the opinion, they would refer more patients to me. If they didn't like the opinion, they would stop referring. Of course, I had other sources of referrals so I didn't really suffer.
At the end of the day, though, what happens when you allow that to continue is that the insurance company—I'm assuming Gagetown has the same philosophy—eventually ends up with only the practitioners who provide only the opinions they like. That tends not to be based on the best interests of the patients. In the insurance industry's case, it would be based on profits. That's never a good thing. You end up with poor-quality providers and profitable insurers. So I have to congratulate you on keeping that advocacy going.
I want to ask some hopefully very quickly answered questions.
I would like to ask our psychologists, if I may, Joyce and Robin, is this type of therapy regulated in Canada? Is it under any supervising authority? Is there a regulatory body outside of the psychotherapy profession?