Well, I think yet again there seems to be some confusion. Why are you treating the Arctic differently from how you're treating the Gulf of St. Lawrence, or Labrador, or the west coast of Canada? The Canadian Arctic is Canadian. We have extended our economic zone out to 200 nautical miles, as we are allowed to under law. We are now delimiting, we are mapping the seabed to extend our continental shelf, our sovereign exploitative rights, up to the maximum, which could be 350 nautical miles.
The other nations are doing the same in a very logical approach. We are sharing data with them. There does not need to be an international treaty for the Arctic.
There's also another myth that somehow the Arctic is the same as the Antarctic, and I want to just tell you that the Antarctic and the Arctic are polar opposites. One is a land mass covered by ice, which is in dispute because there's no ownership. In the north, which is ours, there's no dispute over the land, and the North Pole is over water. So there's confusion, yet again, in the regimes that should be up there. I'm hopeful that with a little more explanation—