So this could be an important first step, I gather from what you're saying, Ms. Simon, in the building of a trust and the potential of a partnership on sovereignty in the Arctic.
I'm interested in your point on the inclusion of Nunavik and Nunatsiavut in the northern strategy. The arbitrary nature of the Arctic Circle doesn't define the Inuit people in Canada and perhaps shouldn't be allowed to define a northern strategy. Nunatsiavut is on the route north, and the conditions in terms of ice, weather, and the lives of people are very similar.
A lot of our talk in this committee has been about climate change. Obviously it has some significant effects on the way of life of the Inuit in Canada. Is there a problem on the development side? Will the need for more small harbour or wharf development be more important as conditions change? Is it something that would be on your agenda, as far as the kinds of expectations you would have from a northern strategy and a northern sovereignty effort are concerned?