Can I just shift gears for a minute?
I was reviewing some of the testimony that came before this committee. Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. both talked about the land claims. Of course, I pulled out the land claims implementation policy and noticed that Makivik is part of the land claims coalition. When we're talking about Arctic sovereignty, my understanding of it is that Arctic sovereignty will truly be achieved when we fully implement the land claims agreement that had been negotiated and signed in good faith. And of course we've had the Auditor General back in 2003 say that the government, INAC, cannot just implement the letter of the agreement; they must implement the spirit of the agreement.
Can you tell me how you think full land claims implementation would actually help establish sovereignty in the north, in Nunavik, in particular?