Mr. Chairman, I will just make two or three really quick comments. One, on the issue of supply, it is a 20-year plan. As to the 2% question on the envelope growth, this is an organization whose funding has grown by over 50% in the last five years. The 2% comes on top of that 50% growth. Going forward, the 2% itself amounts to about $12 billion over that 20-year period.
In the context of a 20-year plan, the government certainly was committed to having the department come back for a review of that plan. It is not a static plan. We don't expect it to survive intact for 20 years. The government will review that plan, I suspect, on a three-year basis, which is about the right kind of time to understand what's going on in terms of changes that are out there.
Lastly, we absolutely have prioritized all our major procurements, based on the lifespan of the existing equipment and the amount of time we expect it to take under contract to get new equipment, so we are moving all that forward, but in a program that is this big with a capital procurement run rate of $5 billion to $6 billion a year, things move by months, and sometimes by a year or two, depending on what the market actually has to provide and what the needs are.
We will actually answer in writing, if the member would like that.