Thank you.
I am just going to ask one question and then I will yield the floor to Mr. Bachand.
People can view this incident in two ways. On the one hand, they can think that the flight met all the conditions and that is the government's reaction that should be questioned instead. Or, on the other hand, they can think that, while the flight observed the zone established by international law, it was in a grey area and was one more way for Russia to assert its claim of sovereignty in the Arctic.
Which view is closer to yours?