What we say to our military colleagues on the ground in an environment other than Afghanistan and Iraq is to coordinate through the coordination mechanism, and then they will know where the humanitarian operation is happening. We will know where their operations are, and we won't go there.
Exchange of information is really important. I honestly don't think direct protection of aid workers is advisable, because our protection is inclusion and acceptance. That's how we think we should be protecting ourselves in operations. We want to be accepted by the communities, by the civilians. For example, in Somalia now there are a lot of bad people running around, armed groups. I don't even want to call them what they should be called. They occasionally--more often than in lots of other countries--stop and abduct for ransom or for robbery or even attempt to kill aid workers.
We believe that our best protection other than arming ourselves and asking for armed protection is working with the communities, and the communities then negotiate with those armed groups. These armed groups are not legitimate armies. They eventually do come from the communities. Whenever in Somalia there is an incident, we suspend our activities, and we tell the communities we're working with that it's not safe for us.