Yes, the Congo is just... The trouble is that all those factions I mentioned, and nations, are fighting over something that's just below the surface of the earth: natural resources. That's the problem.
The solution for the international community to provide some level of security is that you're going to have to have some internal boundaries within the country and have people in an area where you can protect them if it's that bad. The trouble is that the UN would never do that, because it would have to fight its way in. There are so many areas where the diamonds and the gold and all the resources are that you'd end up going in there and being one of the other factions. There's no way, in a country the size of Quebec or Ontario or Europe, the UN could ever generate that number of troops.
It was different in Darfur. You and I communicated on this. With the situation in Darfur, I didn't see us going in and defeating the Khartoum government, but I did see us going in and protecting the women and children in the refugee camps and booting out the terror...or whoever they were; the ones who were the bad guys.
Also, in Chad, where not displaced persons but refugees were provided protection, that's something the UN could do.