No, no. If all he's saying is that Mr. O'Callaghan's views don't reflect that of the company, then we can accept that, if that's what he wants to say. I assume if he wants to make a representation to the committee itself, he can make one in writing, or whatever. I have nothing against the person. It's just simply the fact that if we go somewhere else and somebody doesn't like what someone says, can we then say, okay, someone wants to rebut that or say something different by way of argument? I'm just wondering whether that's something we're going to accept on an ongoing basis?
