Yes, I consider it a very positive response; of the 29 recommendations, they accepted 27 and are going to work on putting them into effect.
Of the two that were not accepted, the 28th was about night flying. I agonized a lot over night flying. The reason I agonized was that statistics show that if an accident happens or a helicopter is forced to ditch at night, the fatality rate is much higher than if it happens in the day. Not only are you risking the lives of the passengers, but you're also risking the lives of the SAR technicians who are trying to rescue them. The whole risk is greater. At the same time, a bare-bones S-92 helicopter costs $20 million; fully equipped, it's $25 million. These are not cheap. Nobody would be expected to have several of them sitting around just in case a backlog occurred.
It's a really difficult problem, and I suggested a possible compromise. I suggested that a worker representative, a C-NLOPB representative, an oil operator representative, and a helicopter operator representative have a committee, and if it was imperative that there be night flying to clear up a backlog and if the weather and everything else were suitable, then they could authorize it. That's how I approached it.
The other recommendation, which C-NLOPB has not commented on but has submitted to the two governments, was that there should be a separate safety authority, as in the United Kingdom, in Norway, and in the United States. The presidential commission recently reported--on January 11, I think--and also recommended a separate safety agency.
The federal government has not said anything about that recommendation as yet, but the provincial government has announced that it's in favour of it.