Chairman, if I could put my two questions on the table, and then ask Madam Folco to put hers on the table, then we could have all three answered at the same time.
I have two clarification questions, Mr. Chairman, through you to the minister. With regard to clause 20, which calls for what amounts to a temporary on-duty demotion for those CF members above the rank of private who are sentenced to detention, do you see this temporary on-duty detention having the potential for long-term interpersonal relationships in the chain of command? In other words, would it cause problems for NCOs who are forced to serve as a private for a period of time and then return to the position of authority following his or her sentence? Could it cause longer-term problems to the chain of command?
Secondly, Minister, under clause 40...just some clarification here. That would require a court martial to summon an accused member. The wording here is a little vague. I'm left with wondering whether this clause would legally require members to testify if called upon to do so, or does it simply require them to be present?
If Madam Folco could put her question in....