This is not a drafting error. This is replacing lines that are in the current bill. The lines are different on the French side compared to the English side of the page in the bill itself. So “86” is captured in the English version on the line above the line that you're reading on the amendment motion, and “86” in the French version is captured on the line that is being changed. That's why it shows up on the French version but not the English version. So 85 and 86 are both captured in this listing even though you don't see them on the motion. That's because they were already in the bill.
On March 23rd, 2011. See this statement in context.