Thanks.
Mr. Dryden, you're touching on the essential politics of the issues, obviously, and in fact it's not so much about the rules of engagement, it's really about what the intent of governments was when they signed up to the Security Council resolution. I think Mr. Harris asked a variation on the same question.
But as the admiral says, in terms of the ongoing debate, everyone knows there has been a vigorous discussion around the NATO table. I don't think anybody around that table is going to get dragged into anything they don't want to get dragged into. And similarly, on the discussions that took place before the Security Council resolution was actually landed, people have very specific views about this. As you say, Mr. Dryden, countries will decide what they want to bring to this effort. Some have already said they support resolution 1973, but they're going to support it by doing humanitarian operations or they're going to do very specific sets of things.
I think you'll find that as this mission takes more shape and definition--it is still very early days--countries will be determining how they get into this mission, whether they get into the mission, and what they're going to contribute. But again, I think my colleagues from the Department of Foreign Affairs might be best placed to answer this in more detail.