I have to tell you that I am lost. This is moving very quickly. I think I understood, but I have to confess that perhaps I may not have.
The subamendment seems to suggest that three people will speak in the first round. I would like to understand. In the last meetings of this committee, it seemed that opposition people were allowed to speak in order of representation and then we went to the Conservative Party.
So I would like to understand why we are not following that logic of letting opposition members speak in the order of their representation and then moving to the Conservatives. That was the logic in the last Parliament, I see. I think that we could follow this order: NDP, Liberal Party and Conservative Party in the first and third rounds.
I would like things to be clear before we vote. I would like the proposal before us to be clear, because the order has changed a couple of dozen times. So can we please have it written out? At least let's just use a C, an N and an L. I will understand that. We don't need to have the letters C, N and L translated.
Thank you.