I have one final question, if I have a chance, Mr. Chair.
You mentioned in your earlier paper, and you mentioned it again today, that NATO believed and believes that it can't act alone outside this area without the Security Council. Would you give that the legitimacy of almost the rule of law with respect to what NATO can or can't do? It is a regional organization under the United Nations charter, etc., etc. I know that in practice, obviously, Rasmussen's comments underline that, but would that be at the height of the legal or conventional state of play?