I'm going to stop you right there, Mr. Harris, before you start circulating papers. I'm going to rule this as inadmissible. As you guys know, chapter 16 of O'Brien and Bosc deals with the legislative process. At the bottom of page 766 and the top of page 767 is the issue of relevance as it refers to amendments to a bill. Since this is an amendment at second reading, this amendment that you're proposing is inadmissible, and I'll just quote:
...is inadmissible if it proposes to amend a statute that is not before the committee or a section of the parent Act, unless the latter is specifically amended by a clause of the bill.
Since you're quoting section 6.1 of the Criminal Records Act and it's not being amended by Bill C-15, your amendment is inadmissible. So, I'm ruling it out of order.