Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I want to thank you both for the work that you do. Certainly, Wounded Warriors is a very impressive organization. In some respects you are an organization that goes where the government can't go and leads into fields of therapy that the government can't go into because there is no statistical or evidence-based proof that some of this stuff works.
On Mr. Opitz's reference to the dog and horse program, when you start to fund something like that do you have any intention in the back of your mind of developing, if you will, evidence that this kind of program actually does work, that you can move beyond the anecdotal to the evidence so that the government can actually see its way clear to moving into the program, and if you will, taking over from you?
I think you are leading-edge. Do you do it on an intentional basis?