Let me speak to your last point first.
We have always had more reservists respond than were required at very short notice, especially if it is within that geographical area. But certainly in the case of floods, whether in the Saguenay region, Saint-Jean, or Winnipeg, we have had a national response to them.
One of our challenges is ensuring that we don't search too early in the process, so that we don't take people away from their civilian jobs. But certainly our voluntary response has never been an issue, and we continue to have great success in preparing and answering the call.
In terms of the reserve units responding, there's a bit of a misnomer regarding that term; there are formed units of reservists as opposed to a specific unit. So it may not be the Loyal Edmonton Regiment , or HMCS Chippawa. But there are units of reservists that sometimes are drawn from a larger geographical area. So in the case of port security, port inspection, diving responses, they may come from a number of units.
We coordinate exercises throughout the year to ensure that those groups are trained as a formed body, and in fact we train more individuals to ensure that on short notice we get a sufficiently trained cadre.
In terms of the army reserve, I'll have General Bury speak to the success with things like the Arctic Response Company Group, Territorial Battalion Group, and those type of responses