That amount is composed of the following, because there are some important considerations that drive that number.
First of all, we had about a billion dollars in spending authority last year to settle the Manuge case. Unfortunately, because of timing issues, we were only able to spend less than $500 million of that amount. As part of that $1.45 billion, $506 million is associated with the Manuge settlement, which will be spent, in fact, this year.
In addition, because the budget was tabled after the main estimates for 2012–13, there were budget measures that served to reduce the amount of spending authority that Parliament had given us. Included in that $1.45 billion is a further $210 million in spending authority reductions associated with budget 2012.
Further, there's about $250 million associated with capital expenditure that did not occur because of delays in the delivery of the equipment.
All of which to say, Mr. Chair, that there's about $1.1 billion included in that $1.45 billion associated with reductions to our spending authority for reasons that were beyond our control.
At the end of the day, our operating budget carry-forward, an indicator you may be familiar with from other departments, was $356 million, representing 1.7% of our spending authorities, well in line, I think, with other government departments.