Well, if I'm not mistaken, today the head of mission position is held by Britain, but I might be wrong. I know that it was the Americans for a few consecutive terms.
It's interesting because the OSCE mission very clearly understands what the major objective is: to find a peaceful and long-lasting resolution to the Transnistrian conflict. They have engaged in a dialogue with the Transnistrian regime as well, although they have very limited access to that territory, which means that their possibilities are very limited indeed.
We conduct regular consultations in the so-called 5+2 format. It has been created to find a peaceful resolution to the conflict. Unfortunately, the negotiations do not always bring any clear or tangible results.
Today, the presidency of the OSCE is held by Italy, and the political representative of the OSCE in the 5+2 format is the former Italian foreign minister, Franco Frattini, who, by the way, is a good friend of Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. They have mentioned this on several occasions. He tries to play a constructive role. We had hoped there would be more progress achieved during this presidency.
Recently, we signed five protocol agreements with Transnistria. It was under the Austrian presidency, at this time last year. We have signed agreements on such matters as recognition of Transnistrian diplomas. We also signed an agreement giving the Moldovan population on the right bank of the Dniester River the right to cultivate their lands, which are unfortunately situated in the Transnistrian part.
It's not yet there, but we have signed an agreement and we have tried to implement this de facto protocol.
Yes?