As I told you earlier on, “peacekeeping” is a term of another era. You might get away with “peace support operations” as such, but we're into conflict resolution that does call for security forces to potentially have to be engaged in extremis to be able to use force to stabilize a situation and protect a certain capability that you know will be a force multiplier, ultimately, to achieve the mission, as the helicopters are, as an example.
When we look at combat, we're not there to win wars. We're there to help stabilize and protect civilians. That's the aim of the exercise. Peacekeeping, if you want to use that term, is today about how you protect civilians in order to permit the human security envelope, which has all the other dimensions—humanitarian, legal, nation-building, and so on—and then the room to be able to pull it together. How do you get the diplomats and the military to come back with solutions that will change the nature of the conflict as it adjusts over time?