I would like to continue on this for a second. The problem all of us have had in trying to deal with this is going from a very extensive bill, set of amendments, and the National Defence Act, as well as regulations at the same time. We have four different things we're trying to look at at the same time.
I think what I see in this amendment is an attempt to specify some of those things that you are saying will be left to a decision later as subject to what would be perceived by rank-and-file members as fairer consideration. Mr. Bezan can correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that we end up with what's in the act for summary, because we end up with minor infractions. We end up with several different lists, and this is an attempt, I think, to specify some of the things—I believe Mr. Bezan is correct on this—would be perceived by rank-and-file members as being severe.