That's a good question, sir. In fact, one of the recommendations from Justice Deschamps was to clean up our definitions, make them easier to understand, and give them all residence in one policy, or at least unify them so that people aren't searching all over the place for different policies and different definitions.
As a military member, my definition of sexual harassment, for example, is different than that of my public service colleagues. My definition of sexual harassment is harassment that occurs regardless of where I am, on the sports field, in the grocery store, at work, or on deployment, whereas sexual harassment at the workplace for my public service colleagues will be something that happened in the workplace. We need to ensure that the nuance we create for our own military members is resonant, and well-understood by every single man and woman in uniform.
The fact that we said understanding is an important part of our action plan.... People understand what sexual misconduct means. They understand the difference between right and wrong, but what can we do about it? What are the best practices around the country and externally? What facilities, or as Jen Bennett mentioned, what other organizations or rape crisis centres, for example, can help us determine the best way forward in order to meet this insidious need? We need to take all of the good things and put them within our action plan so we're not starting from time zero. We need to acquire a huge understanding about how to eradicate this behaviour, not just eradicate the behaviour itself.