I'm just going to jump in quickly because I am limited on time, but you started to go towards the next part that I want to talk about, which was the Arctic specifically.
Due to the changes in the Arctic, in particular opening up new travel passages, there is more more interest globally. What does that mean for our navy, in order to maintain what we do have? Of course, that is notwithstanding the fact that both of you have made remarks to the effect that the infrastructure that we have needs to be recapitalized or reinvested in. I'm interested to hear from Mr. Lerhe as well. What does the situation in the Arctic mean in terms of what we're providing? In your opinion, do we have to be expanding on the naval program just because of the particular changes in the Arctic?