Okay.
One of the recommendations the military ombudsman made was that:
...the Canadian Armed Forces retain medically releasing members until such time as all benefits and services from the Canadian Armed Forces, Veterans Affairs Canada, and Service Income Security Insurance Plan have been confirmed and are put in place.
Part of that would be to allow the findings of the clinicians. When they determine that somebody has to medically release and that the injury was as a consequence of service duty, he's recommending that this adjudication apply for their back pensions, their medical pensions. Right now, upon release, they have to apply to Veterans Affairs for the different benefits, so there's a gap.
In essence, they've been evaluated by a military doctor, but then upon their release or upon their trying to apply for veterans benefits, they have to go through another system and prove to a Veterans Affairs doctor that this injury was indeed as a consequence of service.
Do you see any reason that we couldn't use the evaluations of the military clinicians for the purposes of the pension adjudication?