As much as I'd like to take credit for it, this is not about our government; this not about the ombudsman; this is not about any party or any particular person. I appreciate that I just had the opportunity to finish this file in an appropriate way.
I want to highlight one person who did not get highlighted. He is not a cadet. He is a sergeant who was serving. I got to meet him afterwards and he pinned this on me today. He's the one who, I was told by the cadet committee, really championed the cause.
I will just mention a point. This is also very important, because it's about lessons for the future. We talk about just righting a wrong, but I got to meet with the cadets and talk about what these issues were. They're adults now. They were kids at one time, and that's what happened to them. They were ordered not to talk to anybody about it. We've learned from this. This is not just about the money, as they said; this is about the process we take and about making sure they get compassionate closure. I'm very happy that all members from all parties have really supported this.
To answer your question, when we look at the wider aspect, for us to be able to have engagement in the world and have a better understanding militarily, when we're talking about the leadership that we have, we have to have a footprint outside in key areas, and that's what this program represents. It allows us to have situational awareness and to have influence as well. We had to rebuild some of this, and a little more work needs to be done.
Do you want to take it?