The Canadian military involvement at this particular time is that we've trained 5,000 people and that is sufficient, but what have we trained 5,000 people to do? Is the training that we're giving them going to help them if Russia decides to roll over their border again somewhere else?
We need to look at.... That's what I'm saying, full spectrum. It's not just the military. It's government and everybody else being involved in it. There are a lot of things happening that we don't know about and we're not privy to, and that is the way it is. The Ukrainian government will have a checklist of what it would like to see from us, and if we don't provide the Ukrainians with what they think they require, they will go somewhere else, the U.S. or somewhere else. We have to sort of make a decision as a government on what we're going to do.
We've done a token, which is there now and working very hard and everything else, but there are lots of other considerations that we have to look at: political, economic, and all the other various different things. If we're going to protect the country from being annexed by a hostile force then we have to do a little bit more than throw 200 soldiers 18 miles away from the Polish border to train them in basics. That's all it really is, basics really. We're just going through the motions of basics.
The reason I believe we should do this is that I've been involved in Africa and in the Middle East where we've had to do this, and if we only go in there with half measures, I know what the consequences are. I've also been into Afghanistan on behalf of the Canadian government to do other work in Kandahar Province. I went in with all the promises and then halfway through, it became politically non-viable, so I was prevented from doing the other things we were going to do.
This was $65 million, one of the biggest deals that Canada put into Afghanistan before we pulled out, and while we were there, it worked. The whole thing worked, and we achieved the goals that we went in there for, but on the way down there was a lot of interference from various different areas about what we should do and what we shouldn't do. We went in there with a plan, but that plan changed depending on who was running that plan, and consequentially it was very difficult to work through armpits of bureaucracy. That's another problem, and we have to sort that out; otherwise, we just keep going round and round in circles