Right now, NATO contributes to various operations and missions on more of an ad hoc basis. If there's a need for trainers, it will mobilize those trainers from different member states and send them out. What I'm talking about is creating almost standby capacity for this type of reform. There is, by the way, a whole methodology, an entire one, with many different sorts of systems and lessons learned on how to do this effectively and how to build security institutions. NATO could be a home for this institutionalized knowledge in order to really develop some thought leadership capacity in that area.
What I'm talking about is having standing capacity, and not just on the military side, but to branch off and look at policing, too, and to look also at building the capacity of intelligence agencies and to build the capacity of governance agencies that provide oversight. I'm talking about NATO developing a holistic capacity for this, because I can tell you that despite the fact that we view security sector reform as the linchpin for successful post-conflict reconstruction, there is no institution globally that has a mandate on a sufficient scale to develop this capacity, to develop these lessons learned, and to deploy broadly.
The UN has units that look at this, but they're small. They're under-resourced. The OSCE has looked at this in the past and has developed methodology and best practices, but again, it has largely abandoned efforts. I think NATO could be one institution that could take a leadership role in this.