Mr. Finn, you made comments about the Aurora as it links into the future platform that's going to be used for aerial surveillance in NATO to replace the AWACS. I know “Strong, Secure, Engaged” never really put forward a long-term view of what we're going to do in replacing the Auroras.
Is that because we're looking at what NATO might do and how that may impact our sub hunters, those being the Auroras, in doing that long-distance surveillance?