Okay. First of all, no.
There are lots of bilateral intelligence sharing arrangements. You know of the Five Eyes, of course, because Canada's part of that, and it has played, traditionally, a large role. We have in NATO today, with this joint intelligence and security division that has been in existence for just over a year, a concerted effort now to increase intelligence sharing in NATO by forming many panels. We're thereby linking, for the first time, civilian intelligence with military intelligence and therefore encouraging allies to share more. We now have a system called BICES—another terrible NATO acronym for you—which is a distinct agency that allows all allies and partners in the European Union to file the intelligence reports they're willing to share with allies. They can choose the level of classification, and they can choose whom they want these to go to. That's a voluntary effort, but by being voluntary it encourages more intelligence sharing than if we had tried to have a one-size-fits-all approach.
The situation is progressively developing, but it's always, always, always going to be a basic privilege and a right of any country that originates intelligence to determine with whom and what it wants to share. NATO could be a hub to facilitate this, but we can't change that fundamental national right.