I think this is where you really need to speak to people who have access to the secret and top-secret information, because that's not necessarily in the public domain.
There are two things. First of all, ballistic missile defence is different from what you need for cruise missiles. They are low flying versus the ballistic trajectory. The JLENS system that went rogue is to deal with cruise missiles, and we're waiting to see whether they tinker it, do things to launch it. Everybody is concerned about cruise missiles because the architecture is difficult.
I would add, too, that there was the case of a drone landing at the White House. That's again because it was low flying, low speed, and our detection is for high-flying, high-speed airborne threats, so that's something that everybody is looking at.
On the ballistic missile defence, I just want to say two things. First of all, we do contribute via our Sapphire satellite, so it's not like we're doing nothing.
There is also no guarantee that even if Canada says we want to go into ballistic missile defence that it will be a NORAD mission. Right now, it's a USNORTHCOM mission. It's working really well. To then give it back to NORAD is going to require considerable thinking about how that would function. I just share that with you.