Well, first let me say that our commitment to a country like Mali or Iraq isn't defined by a period of time when we may have military or police deployed. Our commitment stands a much longer period of time, and in the case of Mali, we've been a major development assistance contributor for a number of years. I think we're the second largest. We also contribute all kinds of other supports through capacity-building, training, and now through our military contribution.
That commitment, a partnership, will be an ongoing one. There is a period of time when military contributions, peace operations, are required to stabilize it as it goes through a peace process, but that is almost always longer than most countries would like it to be, because these processes are complex. I would say this is one of the virtues of this smart pledging concept that the United Nations is asking us to adopt. The smart pledging allows us to give the United Nations, over a longer period of time, a rotation of these assets that allows them to sustain their peace operations. Even when individual countries may decide that they will cease their contributions, others will be allowed to step in, in an organized and predictable manner.