Let me address both elements of your question.
One is in terms of leadership. We do not exclude a Canadian taking over the leadership of a UN operation if such an opportunity were to present itself and if it were an opportunity for Canada to make a difference.
Our approach, I would say, is actually more ambitious than you would suggest. Our approach is to try to make a difference in the way the UN runs its peace operations across the board, not just in an operation to which Canada might make a discrete contribution. We have 100,000 peacekeepers in the field. Canada's 600, contributed here or there, is not going to make a transformative difference to UN peace operations.
That's why our approach is to ask, can we fix the systemic issues in the UN, which include its under-representation of women at all levels? Can we fix the training gaps that you have identified, which are really important? We think that's one area in which Canada can bring real value in terms of the kinds of training we can provide and have provided in such places as Afghanistan, which have really had an impact. If we can train the troop-contributing countries better, so that when they go into the field they're making a bigger and a more positive difference, we think we can have an impact more widely across the UN system.