Thank you, Madam Chair.
It's indeed a pleasure to be able to, first of all, thank our witnesses.
I know that Sheila Fynes is still with us. I want to thank her for her advocacy and for telling her story, which is difficult to do.
Again, it's because of your voice that we've been able to address a lot of these issues over the years. I'm all too familiar with the loss of Stuart, as well as Shawna Rogers. I was parliamentary secretary when we dealt with those. All too often we ran into roadblocks, with provost marshals and DND blocking the timely release of information and treating families with disrespect.
I think that because of Sheila Fynes's advocacy, a lot of that now has changed. Despite the incredible agony and the tragedy of every suicide that we experience, at least there is I think a better process in place now than there was 14 years ago—in Stuart's case, 12 years ago.
I want to ask our witnesses some questions about the clinical analysis of suicide. I know that we always like to talk about PTSD. I can tell you that 10 years ago there was still a debate as to whether it even existed. Ms. Gallant was just talking about the trail-blazing work of some psychiatrists on that, but we were still trying to put everything in a box, saying it was depression or it was anxiety or there were other mental health issues.
Have we ever been able to break down which of those issues—if we don't lump them all together as PTSD—is the leading cause of suicide within the Canadian Armed Forces? I've had conversation in the past with Colonel Rakesh Jetly about how often the trigger can be attributed to service versus how many suicides are happening because of relationship breakups, financial difficulties, and so on. Are those the triggers, or is the trigger actually service-related?