Here's what's interesting about that approach. If we had a civilian rather than military approach to dealing with domestic security issues in the event of climate shocks, if I can call them that, we could recruit a wider range of people and introduce them to domestic security without them having to jump directly into the military. The civilian structure could work together with the military structure.
There is tremendous potential indeed. The final argument for moving in this direction is cost. It's much cheaper to have civilians take on certain projects than use the military as the primary resource. The military should always be the last resource to be used. You always need to be prepared for other contingencies. If the military is always available to conduct domestic operations, it loses its ability to act quickly elsewhere in the world.