There are a couple of ways to look at it. If we're talking about keeping the same sets of rules and not increasing the size of the force, we're going to have to make some trade-offs, because we'll be less able to do other things.
In part, with the personnel piece, if we're going to have people spending more time doing that, we might want to think about giving them some specific and dedicated training, rather than having them take on some of these functions as sort of an ostensibly unplanned for but regularly anticipated function, which kind of seems to be what [Technical difficulty—Editor].
The other point of view would be that if you're going to be recruiting people and giving them the impression that they're going to be doing a certain set of activities, deploying to Latvia or to Iraq, and then they're spending a lot more of their time at home fighting fires or responding to floods, you want to make sure that's what they understand is actually going to happen. What would be unhelpful would be to have people's expectations for what they're joining the military to do be misaligned with what we're actually then sending them out to do in real life.