I can, in general terms. Thank you. I think it's a really important conversation.
There are some data points we can look at. Russia's rebuilding their Arctic military infrastructure to Soviet-era capability. They had stopped and they're returning. I think that's interesting.
Russia is continuing their construction in the Arctic despite the economic woes they are experiencing as a result of their illegal and barbaric invasion of Ukraine. They're continuing to invest in the Arctic. I think that's an interesting data point.
Their military doctrine indicates when and how they would use their equipment from the Arctic, and we see them exercising that. That's another data point.
They are playing a long game and so is China. They don't have a partnership with China at all. We don't see them as collaborating with China, but they co-operate when it is each to their own advantage. I think that is another data point.
China's interest in rare earth minerals and hydrocarbons in our Arctic and their interest in being able to navigate through the Arctic—their construction of icebreakers when they do not have ice-covered waters that require icebreakers of the size and capacity they're building—is another data point.
At one point, two and two equals four, or you can make two and two equal three. We have decided that two and two equals four.
There is no imminent threat. We agree with all of the analysis, the intelligence and the military view. That said, everything I've described is not happening in a vacuum. We have to be aware and we have to understand it.