If we're talking about artillery shells and not smart weapons...because smart weapons are more complicated. The pieces to them involve more than a single country, and manufacturing is very, very complicated. If we're talking about old-fashioned artillery shells, then this is a matter of manufacturing capability.
Years ago, decades ago, we had this capacity. It has understandably atrophied over the years without a Cold War push behind it. I think military services have been understandably.... I don't want to say they've been mesmerized, but certainly they've been attracted to the more high-tech weapons. The idea of artillery tubes and old-fashioned 155 shells was not the most exciting thing. As it turns out, in this particular type of war they have proved to be critical.
I don't think it's a matter of any country's individual capacity. I think it is a matter of NATO planning and in a sense parsing out who can do what to bring up the overall level of production. Defence budgets for the production of weapons tend to be geared a great deal toward the national industry, and—