I'll just clarify that. This is under the third line of inquiry, which deals with evaluation and contract award. In 10 instances, we did not have sufficient evaluation information to determine whether, in fact, the contract had been rightfully awarded. If you don't know what the individual evaluators did and you don't know what the consensus evaluation is, it's difficult to say that the contract was rightfully awarded. Then, in other circumstances, we found, as in the example I gave with the Leopard conversion into monuments, that the bid validity period had expired.
There are other examples I could give, such as one where there was a requirement for an educational background, but the resource did not have the required educational background to meet the mandatory criteria. By definition, if you didn't meet the mandatory criteria, it's a wrongful award of contract.