I think it's important to clarify. Under the purposes of our review, there were not many pieces of the procurement file we looked at that actually involved defence-related goods or services. Traditionally these are contracts less than $5 million, but that's where DND would still have their own contracting authority.
I'm not trying to skirt the question; I'm simply trying to explain why we reviewed DND the way we did. We reviewed all 17 departments and agencies in the same manner, using the same methodology. However, it goes back to the question of funding. If we did have additional funding, we would have the ability to pursue, perhaps, larger engagements that could include the defence side of the procurement realm.