I'm hoping, actually, that we can go back to our witnesses, because they are here and we saw some very relevant questions by all of us. I think there is merit to hearing the decision that was made on our calendars going forward.
Thank you for giving me the floor, Mr. Chair, because I do value the importance of having possibly a new list or of looking at our list on our housing study. Indeed, it's very relevant. I just find it always entertaining, if I can say that, that we always conflict ourselves or confront ourselves when we have an ability to hear senior-ranking officials, who come and take the time out of their busy day to listen to us and to give us the explanations we want.
Certainly, the motion on the premises sounds interesting. We are studying housing. I hope, Mr. Chair, that we'll go back to housing and complete that study. I don't know if the value of what Mr. Bezan is proposing can all be agreed upon today. I think there's merit in certain witnesses being included. He brought his list of witnesses when he proposed his own study.
Looking at this motion, there would be possibly a potential amendment that we would make. Could we look at this another day and continue to listen to our witnesses on the Indo-Pacific? If this is not something that the committee is willing to consider, then I would say, yes, Mr. Chair, you would have to release our witnesses, unfortunately, and then we will speak for a very long time together to amend this wonderful motion.