I see Mrs. Lalonde.
Evidence of meeting #91 for National Defence in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was amendment.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Evidence of meeting #91 for National Defence in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was amendment.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Liberal
Marie-France Lalonde Liberal Orléans, ON
This will be very quick, Mr. Chair.
We're all talking about ammunition. Certainly, I'm no expert. At one point, it would be nice to note—maybe it's just a point of order—that this ammunition we're referring to and these rocket motors are actually solid fuel rockets. When we think about experts, maybe that's something we want to talk about here in this committee at one point, either this session or next session. We can talk about the ammunition, what works, the type of equipment that's needed and the transportation safety.
Liberal
The Chair Liberal John McKay
That may or may not be a good idea. I have no opinion on it. If you wish to put it forward as a motion to have experts called on these kinds of munitions, or any kinds of munitions, it can move forward in a similar sort of vein that all of our motions move forward here.
Is there anything else?
Mr. Bezan.
Conservative
James Bezan Conservative Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman, MB
We have some time left, do we not? We're here until seven o'clock.
Conservative
James Bezan Conservative Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman, MB
I just want to bring back for debate the motion that was adjourned on Monday, January 29.
Conservative
James Bezan Conservative Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman, MB
I'll read it again. It states:
That, given the testimony from witnesses at the Nova Scotia Legislature’s Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs, which repudiated denials from the Department of National Defence regarding military homelessness, and that given that there is widespread and incontrovertible evidence that after eight years of Justin Trudeau as Prime Minister our military members can’t afford food or housing, the committee invites: the Minister of Housing; the Executive Director of the Royal Canadian Legion Nova Scotia/Nunavut Command; the Director of Emergency Management for the Halifax Regional Municipality; and the Executive Director of the Halifax & Region Military Family Resource Centre to answer questions on the military housing crisis.
Liberal
Liberal
The Chair Liberal John McKay
Do we have anything else?
Have we emptied the cupboard on motions? I'm sure we can dream up a few more.
We'll look forward to seeing you at the concurrence debate when this meeting is adjourned.
We had Monday set up. I think that's how we'll proceed, unless I get guidance otherwise. I think I'll stay with what we have for Monday, and then we'll see how we can make up this meeting that we had today.
Conservative
Liberal
The Chair Liberal John McKay
We have witnesses set up for Monday on the study that was supposed to happen today.
Liberal
Marie-France Lalonde Liberal Orléans, ON
Before we adjourn, can I read for the record a motion that I brought forward, please? I am within my 48 hours.
Liberal
Marie-France Lalonde Liberal Orléans, ON
I know. You did not. I'm listening.
Mr. Chair, I would like to move the motion for which I gave notice on January 31:
That the committee add two additional hours of study to the “Lack of Housing Availability on or Near Bases for Canadian Armed Forces Members and Their Families and the Challenges Facing Members and Their Families When They Are Required to Move Across the Country” study to allow for the invitation of additional witnesses to provide testimony and answer questions.
February 7th, 2024 / 6:35 p.m.
Liberal
Conservative
Liberal
The Chair Liberal John McKay
Is the motion in front of everybody? Do we all know what it's about? Okay.
I see Mr. Bezan is the first speaker.
Conservative
James Bezan Conservative Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman, MB
Mrs. Lalonde, do you want to talk about it more?
Conservative
James Bezan Conservative Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman, MB
I think that, instead of “two additional hours”, we need more meetings and we need to name some of the witnesses we want to hear from.
I would amend the motion as follows: “that the committee add two additional meetings to study the lack of housing availability”. At the end, after “answer questions”, I would add, “including the Minister of Housing and the Minister of National Defence.”
Liberal
Conservative
James Bezan Conservative Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman, MB
It's only two hours. I think each minister will be one meeting, so you're going to need two meetings.
Plus, there are other witnesses we talked about who appeared at the Nova Scotia Legislature, as reported in the Halifax Chronicle. We need to hear from them.
Liberal
Marie-France Lalonde Liberal Orléans, ON
I think it's more of a clarification, if I may.
I know we were studying and are continuing to study Mr. Bezan's housing motion. What I'm asking is to reflect on adding.... I want to understand how many of the original motions were agreed upon, in terms of our original study. Where are we with our witness list? I think there is ample opportunity for all of us to send in witnesses. Do we still have space on the current motion to add some of those witnesses? That would eliminate the extra hours Mr. Bezan is asking for.