Certainly. I wouldn't even say it's would-be whistle-blowers.
As I said in my prepared remarks, I think there was a general decrease in regular staff members' willingness to talk about day-to-day issues. Much of it may not be controversial, but certainly the twin events—as I said, Mark Norman's charges and the gag order that was put in place, which was pretty substantial and was not well received at all within DND—made individuals reassess whether they should be talking about it and ask whether it could come up in some sort of review. I think that really caused trouble for a lot of researchers, whereas previous contacts had been willing to talk or discuss—