On the sufficiency, I'm not sure. I wish I had a crystal ball so I could figure that out, but what I would suggest is that something in the bill—some sort of provision—would absolutely be necessary. I think it would be a good first step as a liaison officer to have some sort of kind of requirement for communication between the civilian authorities and the military authorities in the chain of command, at the very least.
I would suggest that it would also provide the accused, and the accused's chain of command, the information we need. As you heard, another one of my recommendations is some sort of provision that would forbid statutory decision-makers, but for potential operational requirement issues, from taking irreversible and permanent decisions about the accused's career.
I think that could potentially operationalize that other recommendation in addition to making sure that epic fails like the one you just described don't happen.
