It's an excellent question.
Given the long-standing history and the economic integration of Canadian, U.S. and Mexican economies, broadly speaking, I'd say there's genuine interest, not only from the Business Council and its members but also from our partners in the U.S. and Mexico, to ensure that North American competitiveness and North American energy security, inclusive of energy commodities, critical minerals, nuclear, uranium, etc., are nurtured through this period and enhanced in the years to come.
In terms of the specific wording around CUSMA and where we're going with the review, there are obviously a lot of moving parts at the moment. We have new proposals coming from the U.S. for consideration. We're well advanced in this area, on account of the agreement that you referenced between our previous prime minister and the previous president. There's also a specific element in play on critical minerals co-operation, which was signed under the first Trump administration.
As we look at this broad package and go into the review, the question of whether a stand-alone chapter is warranted will be part of the discussion and the negotiation in the debate. However, I think we need to be very careful about the benefits of having an exclusive chapter versus the potential consequences down the road.